Skylab’s Rise and Fall

Skylab 1 patch designed by Kelly Freas.

Skylab 1 patch designed by Kelly Freas.

NASA will celebrate the 40th anniversary of the launch of Skylab, America’s first space station, on May 14. 

Skylab hosted a trio of three-man crews — Kelly Freas designed the patch worn by the first, launched in May 1973. Once the third crew was ferried home in 1974, Skylab was abandoned.

Hopes that the forthcoming space shuttle would allow the facility to be reactivated were dashed because in there was no way to boost it into a higher orbit and keep it in space until the shuttle program got going.

Ironically, Skylab’s demise seems better remembered than any work that was ever done aboard.

Broadcast reports about its deteriorating orbit predicted likely places it might crash to Earth, representing another unrealized dream, and one more manmade problem for 1970s America to worry about — and therefore deserving of a certain bitter humor.  

Welcome home skylab

In the state of Washington a “Skylab Self-Defense Society” designated Spokane as the “Official U.S. Government Skylab Target.” The society painted a huge red-and-white bull’s-eye target behind its tiny rented office, and sold bull’s-eye T-shirts.

And a fan started his own “Save My Ass!” campaign, publishing flyers that asked people to donate so he could move out of Canada where the giant junk was predicted to hit.

Skylab ultimately re-entered the atmosphere above the southern Indian Ocean in 1979, with pieces landing inland along the south coast of Western Australia.

Several large pieces of Skylab survived, scattered in the Australian outback. Among the largest pieces were the oxygen tanks. One is featured to this day in a tiny museum along the waterfront in Esperance, a port town 450 miles from Perth. Another of the oxygen tanks was sent to the U.S. Space & Rocket Center in Huntsville and is on display there.

 [Thanks to Chronicles of the Dawn Patrol.]

Carbon Copy

Nanophysicists just wanna have fun….  IBM researchers used a scanning tunneling microscope to move thousands of carbon monoxide molecules and make a movie so small it must be magnified 100 million times to be viewed.

[Thanks to David Klaus for the story.]

Starship Century Symposium at UCSD

Starship CenturyThe prospects for returning to the Moon are discouraging and the cost of visiting Mars is out of sight. What should a space fan do? Dream bigger!

Several top scientists and hard sf writers who have devoted their careers to big dreams will participate in the Starship Century Symposium, hosted by the Arthur C. Clarke Center for Human Imagination on May 21-22 in collaboration with Gregory and James Benford. Speeches and panels will present ideas from the Benfords’ new Starship Century anthology of science and science fiction.

Four questions will drive the discussion –

Is this the century we begin to build starships?
Why go to the Stars?
Can we?
Should We?

The vision of a 100 year program to create a starship will be explored – from the development of an interplanetary economic infrastructure, to the structural requirements, the human factors and speculations on what we might find.

The challenges and opportunities for humanity’s long-term future in space will be addressed by the Benford brothers, Freeman Dyson, Paul Davies, Peter Schwartz, John Cramer, Robert Zubrin and more. Science fiction authors Neal Stephenson, Allen Steele, Joe Haldeman, Geoffrey Landis and David Brin will be among the writers discussing what effect these explorations might have upon individuals and civilization as a whole.

The full agenda is here. Two of the highlights will be —  

Tuesday, May 21

Panel: The Future Of New Space

Freeman Dyson
Neal Stephenson
Allen Steele
Geoffrey Landis

Wednesday, May 22

Fiction Writers Panel: Envisioning The Starship Era

moderated by Gregory Benford

Joe Haldeman
David Brin
Larry Niven
Vernor Vinge
Jon Lomberg

[Thanks to Gregory Benford for the story.]

Lord of the Wrings

Canadian astronaut Chris Hadfield’s latest video from the International Space Station answers the question – What happens when you wring out a wet washcloth in a zero gravity environment? 

The experiment was designed by two Nova Scotia high school students, Kendra Lemke and Meredith Faulkner.

Despite the surprising result of Hadfield’s demonstration, a few droplets do visibly escape off-camera, which made me think about the whole dining, hygiene and waste cycle aboard the space station. How do they prevent mold?

As a student living in a basement apartment one summer in Bowling Green, Ohio I had my own troubles getting rid of water. The humidity was such that once a washcloth or anything else got wet it never dried out until it went through a dryer at the Laundromat. Hadfield doesn’t get the option of the college student’s solution — moving out after three months and letting the landlord figure it out.

[Thanks to John King Tarpinian for the story.]

Stephen Hawking at CalTech 4/16

Dr. Stephen Hawking

Dr. Stephen Hawking

You may be forgiven for thinking this sounds like the beginning of an episode of Big Bang Theory – but Dr. Stephen Hawking will lecture on “The Origin of the Universe” in CalTech’s Beckman Auditorium on Tuesday, April 16.

This event is free, with 500 seats in Beckman Auditorium available first-come, first-served. There will also be video feed to another campus auditorium, as well as on the lawn in front of Beckman Auditorium with a giant outdoor screen.

The talk begins at 8:00 p.m.

Ticket disbursement may be as early as 6:45 p.m. at the Western side of the Beckman Mall (nearest the Beckman Behaviorial Biology Building). Stand in the orange “Guests without Tickets” line.

Parking is free after 5:00 p.m., at which time you may park in any open space. There are two parking structures on Wilson Avenue, one on Holliston Avenue, and parking lots on Michigan Avenue.

No word about whether Dr. Sheldon Cooper will offer corrections from the audience.

[Thanks to John King Tarpinian for the story.]

Wright Is Wrong?

The authoritative Jane’s All the World’s Aircraft has reversed course and now recognizes Gustave Whitehead’s 1901 flight in the Condor as the first successful powered flight in history, not the Wright Brothers’ 1903 flight at Kitty Hawk.

In the early hours of 14 August 1901, the Condor propelled itself along the darkened streets of Bridgeport, Connecticut, with Whitehead, his staff and an invited guest in attendance. In the still air of dawn, the Condor’s wings were unfolded and it took off from open land at Fairfield, 15 miles from the city, and performed two demonstration sorties. The second was estimated as having covered 1½ miles at a height of 50 feet, during which slight turns in both directions were demonstrated.

This, it must be stressed, was more than two years before the Wrights manhandled their Flyer from its shed and flew a couple of hundred feet in a straight line after lifting off from an adjacent wooden rail hammered into the ground. And, obviously, because of his demonstrated expertise in manoeuvring, Whitehead had flown missions like this before, suggesting his lead was even greater. (Two months earlier, his No. 20 was reported to have flown from the same field, albeit weighted with sandbags in lieu of an occupant.)

John Brown uncovered the evidence relied on by Jane’s while researching the earliest “roadable airplane.” (It was Whitehead’s concept that an airplane owner would keep it in a private garage, and drive it to a convenient meadow for takeoff.) That led Brown to a Bridgeport Herald report – dismissed by Orville Wright himself late in life. And with many newspaper archives now digitized, Brown’s search of the internet yielded another 85 articles about Whitehead’s flights published in 1901 and 1902.

Brown posted all of these articles on his www.gustave-whitehead.com website, explaining the need for redundancy –

Orville Wright’s main argument in his attempt to discredit what he called “The Whitehead Legend” (August 1945, “US Air Services”, p.9) was his claim Whitehead’s flight was only reported on a back page of a local newspaper. Wright also questioned why that paper had waited four days before reporting the story, oblivious to the fact that it was a weekly newspaper which reported the flight in a special section of its very next edition. Orville cited these points as “evidence” no-one took the report seriously.

There’s also an extensive photo exhibit and analysis and reams of other material at the site.

Fred Jane’s successors now have a different notion why his Foreward to the original 1910 edition discussed the Wrights without any special deference –

All that can be said for certain is that the first Foreword to what is now All the World’s Aircraft is notable in that it does not pay homage to the Wright Brothers for initiating the age of aeroplane flight. Perhaps more from a position of knowledge than ignorance, Jane appears to have considered them to be no more than equal to many others in their contribution.

Jane probably read the coverage of Whitehead’s flight in his local paper, the Portsmouth Evening News, in 1901 and already knew the Wrights weren’t first.

Good grief! First Pluto, now this! The Firesign Theatre was prescient in naming one of their albums

Everything You Know Is Wrong.

[Via Petréa Mitchell.]

Explain This, Scoffers!

“Giant ancient impact crater confirmed in Iowa” is the headline of a story revealing what geologists uncovered on the eastern edge of Decorah, IA.

The basin has been under scrutiny for possible meteoritic origin since its initial discovery of unique rock structures in well drillings retrieved in the region by amateur geologist Jean Young about a decade ago. The impact dates from the Middle Ordovician period almost half a billion years ago, which includes an impact chain across central North America from the Ames crater in Oklahoma to the Slate Islands crater in northern Lake Superior.

I hope you aren’t one of the fans who came out of J.J.Abrams’ 2009 Star Trek reboot nitpicking its version of Iowa’s geography like this writer –

3. I wish J.J. would have explained how the Grand Canyon showed up in Iowa. Or whatever that giant crater was supposed to be that James T. drives the roadster into as a wild youth. Anyone who has ever been to Iowa knows there is no cavernous rock formation that big in Iowa.

Now that scientists have vindicated Abrams, all that remains for fans is the comparatively easy job of explaining how young Kirk managed to drive to the Middle Ordovician period without running out of gas.

[Thanks to John King Tarpinian for the story.]

Klaus: Smartphone Satellite

By David Klaus: Designed and built by British engineers in their spare time in only three months, massing less than ten pounds, no larger than a chrome toaster oven, STRaND 1 will phone home, and includes an app that tests whether in space anyone can hear you scream. It is not, however, in a blue box.

I didn’t think you could put so many in-jokes into one satellite.

Here’s what Spaceflight Now says about the capabilities of STRaND 1 (Surrey Training, Research, and Nanosatellite Demonstrator) –

The phone is mounted on a panel inside the satellite, with its camera aligned with a hole to take pictures of Earth…

Applications installed on the smartphone will help control the satellite, collect scientific data and try to boost interest in space exploration. The Scream in Space app… will play videos of the best screams while in orbit, and the screams will be recorded using the smartphone’s own microphone. iTesa will record the magnitude of the magnetic field around the phone in orbit… The STRAND Data app will show satellite telemetry on the smartphone’s display… The 360 app will take images using the smartphone’s camera and use the technology onboard the spacecraft to establish STRaND-1′s position. The public will be able to request their own unique satellite image of Earth through the website, where images can be seen on a map showing where they have been acquired.

Comet Ready For Its Close-Up

Photographers in the Southern Hamisphere have been snapping beautiful pictures of Comet Panstarrs – see examples at Earthsky.org. In a few days it’ll be our turn. If we’re lucky it might be visible to the unaided eye.

As seen from mid-northern latitudes, Comet Panstarrs might become visible with an optical aid around March 7 or 8. However, the comet will sit in the glow of dusk and will set around 40 to 45 minutes after sunset. By March 12, the comet will be considerably higher in the sky and will set around 75 minutes after sun. What’s more, the comet will be next to the waxing crescent moon on the North American evening of March 12.

The comet will pass closest to the sun on March 10, when it’s expected to be at its brightest.

[Thanks to John King Tarpinian for the story.]