<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taxing Your Fantasy Assets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://file770.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://file770.com/?p=768</link>
	<description>news of science fiction fandom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 23:27:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://file770.com/?p=768&#038;cpage=1#comment-13726</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 05:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://file770.com/?p=768#comment-13726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone sufficiently interested can download a PDF of this segment of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-utl/08_tas_arc_intro_toc_msp.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;2008 Taxpayer Advocate&#039;s Report&lt;/a&gt;, and read the multi-page discussion beginning at internal page 214. 

The lack of technical tax merit to the issue is evident from the fact that one of the subheads near the end is: &quot;IRS guidance could improve taxpayer compliance even if it simply clarified that inworld transactions are not taxable.&quot; 

Who needs the clarification? I&#039;m pretty confident no gamer would contemplate paying tax on any game transaction unless and until it was cashed out in real money. The article&#039;s many footnotes hint that the only people needing IRS guidance are the writers for tax journals who stirred up the question in the first place.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone sufficiently interested can download a PDF of this segment of the <a href="http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-utl/08_tas_arc_intro_toc_msp.pdf" rel="nofollow">2008 Taxpayer Advocate&#8217;s Report</a>, and read the multi-page discussion beginning at internal page 214. </p>
<p>The lack of technical tax merit to the issue is evident from the fact that one of the subheads near the end is: &#8220;IRS guidance could improve taxpayer compliance even if it simply clarified that inworld transactions are not taxable.&#8221; </p>
<p>Who needs the clarification? I&#8217;m pretty confident no gamer would contemplate paying tax on any game transaction unless and until it was cashed out in real money. The article&#8217;s many footnotes hint that the only people needing IRS guidance are the writers for tax journals who stirred up the question in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trintiy</title>
		<link>http://file770.com/?p=768&#038;cpage=1#comment-13711</link>
		<dc:creator>trintiy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://file770.com/?p=768#comment-13711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting fact.  If $1 billion exchanged hands, that means there are bank records somewhere showing that money was deposited for those goods and services.  Hence, the the funds &quot;Should&quot; be reported as income and I think the next logical steps are obvious from that point.  Unless the people accepting payment for these services are doing something interesting to hide the money from the government, I don&#039;t think the IRS has anything to worry about in terms of the monies they are collecting for these sources of income.  I mean, I do privet consulting on the side for some companies, and no matter how they pay me the money goes into a bank account here in the US.  Therefore, unless I&#039;m really stupid and want to run my chances, I report it as income.

I guess I&#039;m just not motivated enough to hide my money from the government.  Alas, I&#039;m a product of my generation: too lazy care, to apathetic to change, a slave to the man because it takes too much energy to rebel.

But if the man starts taking silver for every kill a person racks up on a Blizzard WarCraft server...(in some bizarre Twilight Zone reality) they may just wake the sleeping giant.  That might actually make a great script to a movie. :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting fact.  If $1 billion exchanged hands, that means there are bank records somewhere showing that money was deposited for those goods and services.  Hence, the the funds &#8220;Should&#8221; be reported as income and I think the next logical steps are obvious from that point.  Unless the people accepting payment for these services are doing something interesting to hide the money from the government, I don&#8217;t think the IRS has anything to worry about in terms of the monies they are collecting for these sources of income.  I mean, I do privet consulting on the side for some companies, and no matter how they pay me the money goes into a bank account here in the US.  Therefore, unless I&#8217;m really stupid and want to run my chances, I report it as income.</p>
<p>I guess I&#8217;m just not motivated enough to hide my money from the government.  Alas, I&#8217;m a product of my generation: too lazy care, to apathetic to change, a slave to the man because it takes too much energy to rebel.</p>
<p>But if the man starts taking silver for every kill a person racks up on a Blizzard WarCraft server&#8230;(in some bizarre Twilight Zone reality) they may just wake the sleeping giant.  That might actually make a great script to a movie. <img src='http://file770.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
