By Sam Long: The March 7 issue of The New Yorker magazine has a poem titled “Megamouth Shark” by John Kinsella on page 53 (subscription required). I quote the following lines from the middle of the poem:
…and I can’t help but think
that this tank and its inhabitants are prescient fulfillment
of Frank Herbert’s “Dune,” a pox on emperor houses
of curators and scientists, this Guild Navigator the benign
encapsulation of Edric shrouded in orange gas,
so distorted to outside eyes, plotting the courses of ships
through space without collision, …
SF is rarely mentioned or even alluded to (as here) in the The New Yorker, such that when it is, it stands out.
I’ll note that Stephen King has had a number of short stories published in The New Yorker.
Michael Walsh: true; and I know there are other fantasy and SF authors who have appeared in the NEW YORKER, but in my experience, those genres are seen only rarely in the magazine. Now cartoons with an SF-F theme are quite another thing: they appear fairly often.
And a propos of DUNE the movie, page 52 of the 30 October 2010 issue of the NEW YORKER had a poem, which I reproduce in its entirety below, by David Musgrave:
ON THE INEVITABLE DECLINE INTO
MEDIOCRITY OF THE POPULAR MUSICIAN WHO
ATTAINS A COMFORTABLE MIDDLE AGE
O Sting, where is thy death?
Did I write 30 October? It was the 30 August 2010 issue. Sorry. (Note to self: proofread better before sending….)
I read this assertion approximately once a week. I keep giving similar answer:
or
Recently:
That’s all one entries, each with links I’m not embedding.
This 26 page piece is mostly about Hubbard, goes on about Heinlein, Bill Patterson’s book, mentions “But much of his energy was devoted to publishing stories, often under pseudonyms, in pulp magazines such as Astounding Science Fiction,” etc. January 31, 2011
Blog: The Book Bench
Science Non-Fiction
“Our job is not to predict the future. Rather, it’s to suggest all the possible futures—so that society can make informed decisions about where we want to go.” That’s Robert J. Sawyer writing in…
by Macy Halford Or
Skipping most of the movie reviews:
On and on. SF is mentioned with great frequency.
Or:
Or:
Or:
I’m always wondering whether people who say things things actually read The New Yorker, or is just one of those things they “know” without actually reading the magazine. Because if they do actually read it each week, I end up confused how they miss all the frequent pieces on or about or discussing science fiction and fantasy.
Or if they have in mind The New Yorker of forty years ago, althoug even then you can find plenty of discussions if you looked.
Etc.
Just an observation, but as I say, one sees this about once a week or so.
While I love The New Yorker – and receive it each week, and not just for the cartoons – it’s not exactly a hotbed of skiffyness. (Which is fine.) For that I got to File770 or Locus or …. well, the beat goes on.
Ghu knows that Anthony Lane has never met a genre movie that he doesn’t love to sneer at.
But a lot of other skiffy stuff is mentioned these days.