Pixel Scroll 5/24/16 Bark Side Of the Moon

(1) RELEASE THE MONSTER BALLOT. Jo Lindsay Walton is pleased with the flood of Sputnik Award ballots, and is at least not horrified by one of the suggestions.

Btw: I’ve received some really touching enthusiasm, warmth and wise counsels and offers of support, as well as a pretty significant amount of “eh?” “baroo?” “mph?” “wha-?”, which tbh is also kinda gratifying. One thing I’d love to hear more of is unwise counsel. The best I’ve heard so far is the suggestion that we do the Dungeons of Democracy for real.

Just imagine, ripping it from the Excel and into the streets, playing out the entire vote as a vast LARP, cosplaying Daleky Phoenixes and Hedgehoggy Thing Itselves . . .

(2) WINDLING. Remember, Terri Windling lectures on fantasy at Oxford on Thursday, May 26.

I will be delivering the 4th Annual Tolkien Lecture at Pembroke College, Oxford University this Thursday at 6:30 pm. The Pembroke Fantasy lecture series “explores the history and current state of fantasy literature, in honour of JRR Tolkien, who wrote The Hobbit and much of The Lord of the Rings during his twenty years at the college.”

The lecture I’ll be giving is Tolkien’s Long Shadow: Reflections on Fantasy Literature in the Post-Tolkien Era. Admission is free, but you need to register for a ticket and space is limited. Go here for further details.

(3) LUCAS MUSEUM. Mark Guarino’s Washington Post article “George Lucas’s dream of a Chicago lakefront museum faces choppy waters” even-handedly covers the battle to bring the Lucas Museum of Narrative Art to Chicago, showing the strengths – the vast art collection, and the architecture — and the minuses, chiefly that it will be partially paid with hotel taxes, which raises a question about whether George Lucas really needs to be subsidized by Illinois and Chicago taxpayers.

The Lucases had two real requirements: One, it would be in a prominent location and, two, that it would be near other museums,” he says. “The Lucases are not going to go to another site.”

A new plan approved by Lucas involves reconfiguring an aging extension of the McCormick Place convention center that sits on the lake and partially replacing it with the museum, 12 new acres of parkland, in addition to new convention space. That multipurpose site is more complicated because it involves borrowing nearly $1.2 billion and extending five taxes on hotels and more. Because it is co-owned by the state, approval from Springfield is required. With Illinois in a budget deadlock that is nearing a full year, and the state ranked at the bottom of those with underfunded pensions, the timing could not be worse. Koch says the selling point is long-term revenue in taxes and tourism dollars, as well as that it would add to Chicago’s “meaningful group of museums and cultural assets” that make it globally competitive.

This is both an enormous opportunity to update and modernize McCormick Place,” he says. “It has this element of Lucas, but they are two separate things that would happen to be tied together financially.”

Talks are on hold until the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit rules on a city petition that asks for the lawsuit to be thrown out. Meanwhile, Hobson released a statement calling Friends of the Park “a small special interest group” that has “co-opted and hijacked” the process. “It saddens me that young black and brown children will be denied the chance to benefit from what this museum will offer,” she says.

She added that she and her husband “are now seriously pursuing locations outside of Chicago.” Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti has already said he would welcome the museum in his city.

If the Lucases leave Chicago, it will ultimately discredit the couple’s statements about wanting to help the children there, park advocates say.

“They keep saying how committed they are to the city, but they’re not committed enough to build anywhere but the lakefront,” [Friends of the Park executive director Juanita] Irizarry says.

(4) THIS HAPPENED. N.K. Jemisin started a Patreon campaign less than a week ago and it’s been so successful she can give up her day job.

So, internets. Big changes in Noraland. For the few of you who don’t follow me on Twitter and FB, I Did A Thing. Specifically, last Friday I started a Patreon campaign with the specific goal of breaking free of the 9 to 5 life. I launched it officially at 5:35 pm on Friday afternoon, thinking nobody would much care since Friday News Dump, and thinking that would give me time to fix bugs and work out any kinks in the campaign over the weekend. Instead, to my absolute shock, I hit my baseline goal within 24 hours, and my stretch goal within 48. And it’s still going. People really, really want me to have a retirement plan, apparently.

(5) BEVERLEY OBIT. Jo Beverley passed away on May 23 at the age of 68. Though best known as a romance writer, she also wrote romances with fantasy and magic in them, was a Writers of the Future contest finalist (1988), and published in Songs of Love and Death (2010) edited by George R.R. Martin and Gardner Dozois.

(6) HEARTWARMING WOOKIEE. In “Star Wars’ Favourite Wookiee Goes Back to School”, Lee Costello of the BBC’s Northern Ireland service reports on Chewbacca’s visit to a school in County Kerry.

Chewbacca, Star Wars’ world-famous wookiee, has left pupils at a Republic of Ireland primary school star struck after landing for a visit.

The star is filming the newest instalment of the blockbuster series in County Kerry.

He took a break from the set to visit Scoil Fheirtearaigh National School in Ballyferriter on Monday.

The visit was arranged after some pupils sent impressive artwork to director Rian Johnson.

(7) AND HIS MOM. Meanwhile, Hollywood summoned a viral video maker for 15 more minutes of fame — “J.J. Abrams Surprises Chewbacca Mom”.

Candace Payne, also known as the Chewbacca Mom, took over the Internet this weekend with her Chewbacca mask and infectious laugh. In the video, Candace is sitting in her car, super excited about a purchase she just made: a Star Wars Chewbacca mask with sound. The next few minutes are her trying to contain her infectious laughter. The video broke the all-time total for most views on Facebook Live, and everyone has been talking about the joyful mom from Texas.

James Corden brought Candace out to Los Angeles to appear on The Late Late Show and surprised her with a visit from J.J. Abrams. The trio took a ride in a car, where Abrams gives Candace some notes on how to play Chewbacca, but the best part was her reaction outside of the car when J.J. first surprised her.

Video at the link.

(8) START SPREADING THE NEWS. Looks like this will be no problem in Ireland, but for everyone else IFL Science contemplates “How Do We Tell The World That We’ve Found Alien Life?”

…That’s a topic discussed in a paper from astronomers Duncan Forgan and Alexander Scholz from the University of St Andrews in Scotland (hat tip to Cosmos Magazine for picking it up). They have examined the protocols that are already in place, and have suggested ways that those involved in the discovery should prepare for the media onslaught that would accompany a tentative detection.

“A critical concern for scientists pursuing the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) is the reaction of the world to the knowledge that humans are not the only technological civilization in the universe,” they write. They suggest that the “culture shock” of such a discovery will put SETI scientists under intense scrutiny, which they must be prepared for…..

“SETI scientists must be prepared to not simply announce a detection via press release, but to be a trusted voice in the global conversation that will begin after the initial announcement,” the authors write. “This will require both pre-search and post-detection protocols to be implemented.”

(9) AWARD JUDGES. In Australia, the 2016 Aurealis Awards judging panels have been selected.

There’s a panel for every category – which means a lot of judges. Scroll down to see the judges’ bios.

(10) TRUER GRIT. Damien Walter believes Dune Deserves A New Film Adaptation”.

Dune’s cinematic qualities have made it a natural target for Hollywood adaptations. But the Lynchian weirdness, followed by a lacklustre mini-series, have left the franchise in a televisual limbo for most of the last two decades. Herbert’s own sequels, while conceptually interesting and widely loved by established fans, lack the storytelling muscle displayed in the first book. A risible series of cash-in prequels have dragged the Dune universe down to the bargain basement of pulp fiction. It’s a sad legacy for such a significant work of fiction.

(11) TROLL HOIST. Death and Taxes did an overview of Chuck Tingle’s Hugo nomination that ends with this paragraph:

Luckily these goons didn’t know who they were dealing with. This is Chuck Tingle, leading author of gay dinosaur erotica, licensed massage therapist, and outspoken enthusiast of hardness and love. Nobody nominates him for a prestigious award and gets away with it.

(12) ANOTHER FINE MESS. There’s reason to be interested in Charlie Jane Anders’ impressions about the field, despite the post ignoring the copious documentation available to answer its strawman question: “One way of looking at the Hugo Awards mess”.

So we’re once again having Hugo Awards drama. It’s confusing, because the people who packed the ballot with their choices have a bunch of vague explanations about why they’re upset. (Ranging from “OMG SJWs” and “affirmative action” to “we just want fun stories.”) They generally keep their grievances vague and nebulous (no pun intended), and it’s hard to pin down what they’re upset about. And this year, they changed tactics slightly, putting more “mainstream” choices on the ballot except for some of the short fiction categories.

So I figure one useful way to look at this issue is to ask: What’s changed? If there’s a group of people who are upset, what recent changes could possibly account for their being upset? Here are a few things that occur to me….

(13) AT WISCON. I see a lot of tweets promoting people’s panel appearances, but rarely one so artistic.

(14) THE SIGN OF THE Z. John Z. Upjohn joined Twitter today. The cause was soon revealed.

Alexandra Erin explained in a GoFundMe appeal update:

And because you all pitched in enough to cover airfare for WorldCon before I head off to my current con, Mr. John Z. Upjohn will be providing live twitter commentary of the event [WisCon]…

Erin also delivered another Sad Puppies Review Books installment once the fundraiser hit $300 (it’s now at $775) – Upjohn’s take on The Cat in the Hat.

The Cat in the HatThe protagonist of the book is a cat who develops games, games that are fun (like all games should be), and who wants nothing but to share them with children who are bored. Not so fast, cat! There is a game critic in the house, a fish who is clearly used to thinking of himself as a big fish in a small pond.

I almost threw this book across the room at one point, because the cat is playing a game and he is clearly having a lot of fun, but the fish says, “NO! THIS ISN’T FUN!” Imagine hating fun so much that you lie about what’s fun in order to ruin a game for everyone else….

(15) PRONOUN STICKERS. WisCon 40 registration will have pronoun stickers available.

Hihi!  I want to take a minute to talk to you about an exciting option we’re offering at Registration this year: pronoun stickers!

We offered them last year and got a lot of reaction, so here’s the explanation:

Pronoun stickers are totally optional to wear. You don’t have to declare anything to anyone. You don’t have to wear the same sticker all weekend. These exist to make it easier for all of us to treat each other respectfully.

If someone IS wearing a pronoun sticker, we expect you will use that pronoun for them. Part of our social contract is kind and respectful treatment of each other, and there are few things that feel as terrible as being misgendered ON PURPOSE. If you make a mistake, just correct yourself and move on…..


Options. God bless WisCon. #WisCon

A photo posted by Monica Byrne (@monicabyrne13) on

(16) TOMORROW IS TOWEL DAY. The annual tribute to Douglas Adams, Towel Day, takes place on May 25.

Naturally there are dedicated social media sites– a Facebook page or a Flickr group, and a way to tag videos on YouTube.

There are also hybrid events with in-person and internet components like Lofty Pursuits’ Vogon Poetry Slam. You have only a few hours left to enter online.

If you are in Tallahassee, please come and enter the International Vogon Poetry Slam. It is a contest for the worst possible poem. It happens at 8pm on May 25th as part of our Towel Day celebrations. If you are coming in person DO NOT ENTER ON-LINE. You will get to read your own poem live in front of your victims. The rules are the same….

The Vogon Poetry contest. Rules: The worst original poem will win as judged by us. No appeal is possible.

Sent to [email protected] to be considered for this contest. We must get the poems by midnight on the 24th, Eastern Daylight Time (GMT-5). Late entries will go to the spam folder.


  • Born May 25, 1686 — Polish inventor Gabriel Fahrenheit

(18) NAMING CALLS. Rachel Swirsky considers short story titles in “What should I have titled this essay? (Thoughts on John Joseph Adams’ ‘Zen in the Art of Short Fiction Titling’”).

Titles That Come From the Text

John starts the article by noting several titles that he suggested to authors that he’s published in his magazines and anthologies. He discovered these titles “right there in the text of the stories themselves. When I’m reading or editing a story, I frequently highlight evocative phrases I come across that I can later suggest to the author as a possible alternate title. Sometimes the phrasing isn’t quite right for the title, but it’s something that can be massaged, or combined together with another phrase from elsewhere in the story, that somehow captures the essence of what the story is about.”

I used to do the large majority of my titling this way until I started my MFA program at Mills, where the teacher told me what John Joseph Adams brings up next: “I should note that some writing professors—including notable literary giants—advise against this practice, largely because, they say, doing this puts too much emphasis and meaning on the eponymous phrase when the reader comes across it in the story.”

(19) DON’T CALL ME ISHMAEL. “Moby goes where Brian Eno, and his ancestor Herman Melville, went before” at the LA Times.

As a famously brainy electronic musician — and a descendant of literary royalty — Moby had plenty of lodestars he might have looked to while writing his first book.

There was, for instance, Brian Eno, the pop experimentalist who reflected on his work with U2 and David Bowie in his 1996 volume “A Year With Swollen Appendices.” And the distant ancestor from whom Moby got his nickname: “Moby-Dick” author Herman Melville.

In reality, the DJ and producer best known for 1999’s multi-platinum “Play” album took inspiration from a more unlikely source: Duff McKagan, the tattooed bassist in Guns N’ Roses.

“Honestly, I’d never given much thought to the guy before I read his memoir,” Moby said on a recent morning at home in Los Feliz, referring to “It’s So Easy (and Other Lies),” in which McKagan writes frankly about the excess and the illusions of show business. “But he wrote a book that’s good enough that it transcends the fact that I wasn’t interested in him.”

(20) BLAME OF THRONES. Juliet McKenna has her own tangle of pop culture references to work through — “Sansa Stark’s joined the X-Men? Thoughts on popcultural cross contamination”

I’ve yet to see the X-Men Apocalypse movie, so I can’t comment on Sophie Turner’s performance. Her work on Game of Thrones – especially at the moment (NO spoilers in comments please!) – gives me every reason to expect she’ll do a thoroughly good job.

The thing is, though, this is becoming A Thing for me. An amusement at the moment, rather than a distraction, but definitely A Thing.

I caught a trailer for A Knight’s Tale on the TV last week, which is one of my favourite movies. Now though? That’s the one where Robert Baratheon makes The Joker’s armour while The Vision bigs him up to the crowd…

(21) DISCO SCI-FI. Thomas A. Foster looks back at the Seventies in “Sci-Fi TV of the Disco Era: The Grounded Astronaut” on Pop Matters.

…Another key to understanding the sci-fi of the era: the shrunken profile of space exploration. In the ‘60s, NASA was perhaps the most popular Federal project, partly because fallen leader John F. Kennedy was associated with the “space race”. Television covered every moment leading up to the first moon walk in 1969, and Hollywood pitched in with movies and TV shows (I Dream of Jeannie, Star Trek, the made-in-England 2001: A Space Odyssey). The Jetsons had a dog named Astro, and Houston chose the same name for its new baseball team, which played, of course, in the Astrodome.

As our radio-alarm-clocks flipped to the ‘70s soundtrack, however, the Apollo Program was curtailed by budget cuts and sharply declining interest. The scientific idealism of the ‘60s was victim to chronic civil unrest, distrust of authority, and general exhaustion, as Americans turned to self-improvement (meditation, back-to-the-land/find-your-roots trends); hedonism (swinging, cocaine, disco); and all things para- (the paranormal, paranoia), including persistent rumors that the moon landings had been faked. In keeping with the zeitgeist, most of our TV astronauts of the decade would be lost, passive, or grounded….

[Thanks to John King Tarpinian, Martin Morse Wooster, and Will R. for some of these stories. Title credit goes to File 770 contributing editor of the day Daniel Dern.]

412 thoughts on “Pixel Scroll 5/24/16 Bark Side Of the Moon

  1. Wow to go through that and come out the other end. I respect someone who can do that. Even more respect if they can do it can come out sane at the other end.

    If I felt that way about everyone it would cheapen the idea of respect.

    I am going to give you the benefit of the doubt that this kind of remark wasn’t meant as an ableist dig or just a dig at anyone who would like to transition but can’t for various reasons (health, financial situation, family situation, other factors) but man there is just a lot of assumptions to unpack in what I think you actually meant to be a supportive statement.

    But moving on, we talked about respect in terms of accepting people for who they are without being judgemental about it, the way you phrase yourself you really do imply that one’s gender identity can only be accepted if it either has caused someone pain or their decision to change their gender caused them some hardship, it’s really weird to me to make that sound mandatory, I mean I would really really love if we came to a point where switching genders didn’t even cause people to blink, or maybe they took you out to celebrate the decision. And I’m with lurkertype in the idea of many kinds of gender and many types.

    Again going back to this idea that “womanhood” is only accessible by those who have done this or that specific action, or suffered this or that particular oppression. It’s bad enough that yeah most of us do suffer from aggressions both micro and huge, but if one of us gets out alive and has managed to avoid by luck most or even all of those types of oppression, I say bless their luck, we should all be so lucky.

    And you chide on one hand for treating trans people as a monolith and then you namedrop “Ann Lawrence” and “autogynphilia” as if it’s an accepted theory (except for trans activists apparently, those wily trans activists protesting everything) into the crowd here that I am sure most people are not familiar with that concept. Hell most of these concepts are so far beyond “feminism 101” that even with my many hours of time spenting reading feminist type stuff, I’d need to do even more reading to even comment really, as I’m familiar with the basics enough to go “hey Julia Serano, she wrote that book a friend gave me that made my head explode in a good way” but I seriously doubt I could even begin to discuss those issues with the accuracy and indepth analysis they deserve, and more to the point should I even do so as a cisgender woman?

    I feel comfortable saying that there are a number of loaded psuedo-scientific terms and ideas out there about people who have something about their gender identity or sexual identity that deviates from the social norm and those terms (often created by people with very fancy degrees) have been historically used to harm those deviating people. And that science itself has a depressingly long history of pathologizing “abnormal” behavior, doing medical experiments on those deemed “abnormal” and otherwise treating people as some sort of fascinating bug under a microscope that they can do whatever they want to them in the name of science. I am wary of any “scientist” who treats people that way and I am skeptical of any theory made by people who try to cherrypick evidence to support the theory instead of the other way around.

    Harold asked, what’s the harm in people making statements about an oppressed group from those not directly in a position to do anything, well that’s the thing about normalizing harmful ideas, if enough people say them and repeat them as normal, those who ARE in charge of things will see that and it will definitely have an impact on their decision making. Oppressive systems in society continue to exist because they are supported by people, by society itself, in a self-perpetuating kind of way. To be dismantled, these oppressions must be recognized at every level of society, from nametags to marriage certificates, etc.

  2. Hampus Eckerman on June 5, 2016 at 7:02 am said:
    I do think it is kind of easy. That you accept a persons gender identity does not mean that you have to try to enforce societys gender role on the person.

    How is accepting different from behaving toward them exactly the way you would toward someone who’d been living in that role from birth? Generally accepted social standards do enforce gender roles, no?

    Lenora Rose on June 5, 2016 at 12:19 pm said:
    Iphinome. Since I literally did just that in this same discussion yesterday, I totally understand how that one frustrates and hurts.

    Thank you. Sympathy helps even if I’m going to spend the next month kicking myself for my reaction to it. You’re still owed an answer if I can find a way to start retyping the post without bringing back all the frustration.

  3. “How is accepting different from behaving toward them exactly the way you would toward someone who’d been living in that role from birth?”

    I haven’t said it was different.

    ” Generally accepted social standards do enforce gender roles, no?”

    In small ways, like grammar, yes. Otherwise, no.

  4. In small ways, like grammar, yes. Otherwise, no.

    I use their pronouns.

    Are we good now?

  5. Sure, as long as you don’t question peoples gender identity or set up criteria for it to be accepted.

  6. How about I don’t question their pronoun identity since that’s all you think they’re asking.

  7. How about not question their gender identity which is what they are asking?

  8. Aside from my obvious inability to accept that terminology?

    I’m not going to agree to anything that limits what thoughts are allowed to pass through my head.

    Is there an action you’re accusing me of not taking or of improperly taking?

  9. “Is there an action you’re accusing me of not taking or of improperly taking?”

    No. It is more how you seem to reserve the right to behave like an asshole by questioning others identity and setting up criteria for them. To be fair, I have not seen you do it yet and hope you will not.

  10. I think we’re back to talking at cross purposes again. At some point I hope by coming to know more trans* and being civil Iphinome changes their opinion. This has certainly worked for me and a number of my friends. Sorry for bringing religion in but Judaism has a belief that words and actions can create belief – do the rituals & prayers even if you don’t believe because eventually you will come to believe – very general paraphrasing of complex idea. As writers we believe in the power of words.

    People are allowed Wrongthink(TM).* What’s expected when around others is non-condescending civility, not making insults undercover as jokes, keeping your Wrongthink(TM) from hurting people who are oppressed because of the group(s) they belong to.

    Iphinome has expressed they would do their best to behave appropriately when around trans*. Those of us who are allies are likely to make mistakes due to unconscious bias and social training. And when called on it: We. Don’t. Always. Behave. Graciously. Sometimes. We. Attack. In. Anger/Defense.

    Yes it would be wonderful if tomorrow morning everyone woke up, accepted everyone’s gender identity, and stopped with all the negative associations with non-male genders. And if all other *ist issues were also eliminated. Oh to live to see that day. But that’s not the world we live in. Right now we can request, and in some situations insist, on civil, non-insulting behavior but we can’t force others to think the way we think they should. I’m 100% sure I don’t want to live in a world where others control how I think.

    *Wrongthink = not what I think is the right way to think

  11. At some point I hope by coming to know more trans* and being civil Iphinome changes their opinion.

    How many more and what do you mean by know?

    As for being civil, I know not to ask the things Kevin Standee was asked. Not to mention it at all since it’s rude to point out that I even noticed and that’s not the topic of conversation anyway. Can allies say as much or are they too busy telling someone how so very brave they are for the hundredth time?

  12. @Iphinome

    How many more and what do you mean by know?

    This is an intangible and can take 5, 10, 15, 20, never years. I can hope for something without putting all sorts of specific criteria on how it happens. Time is usually the biggest factor but can’t happen in a vacuum so exposure to trans* needs to be part of the process.

    Can allies say as much or are they too busy telling someone how so very brave they are for the hundredth time?

    Depends on the allies. I’m not into proving anything although you might disagree. Not sure what bravery has to do with being good allies. Good allies listen, support as people want to be supported, and don’t think they know better IMHO. I’m not sure which things I’m good at and which I’m not. I expect to be called out when I screw up and I try to apologize and do better in the future but I’m human and have days where my reactions are bad, bad, bad.

    I do think leaving you to grow, or not, at your own pace makes more sense than trying to force Right think on you right now.

Comments are closed.