By Carl Slaughter:
(1) 3-D printer robot constructs building. “MIT researchers create a robot that can 3-D-print a building in hours”.
The future of construction just got a little bit more real. Researchers at MIT have created a mobile robot that can 3-D-print an entire building in a matter of hours — a technology that could be used in disaster zones, on inhospitable planets or even in our proverbial backyards.
Though the platform described in the journal Science Robotics is still in early stages, it could offer a revolutionary tool for the construction industry and inspire more architects to rethink the relationship of buildings to people and the environment.
(2) Time travel is “mathematically possible.” It’s all in the curve. “Building a real-life TARDIS is mathematically possible, say physicists”.
Tippett and colleague David Tsang from the University of Maryland have used Einstein’s theory of general relativity to come up with their mathematical model for time travel. They claim that the division of space into three dimensions, with time in a separate dimension by itself, is incorrect. Their model instead conceptualizes space-time as a continuum, whereby different directions are connected within the curved fabric of the universe.
Tippett reminds us that time is curved in the same way that space is: “The time direction of the space-time surface also shows curvature. There is evidence showing the closer to a black hole we get, time moves slower. My model of a time machine uses the curved space-time — to bend time into a circle for the passengers, not in a straight line. That circle takes us back in time.”
(3) NASA is running out of spacesuits. (This better be a hoax.) “NASA Is Running Out of Space Suits”.
NASA seems to be running out of space suits for astronauts, according to a new report by the space agency‘s auditor, NASA’s Office of Inspector General (OIG)…..
(4) Mystery excuse. Elon Musk we know, but what’s the National Reconnaissance Office? “SpaceX delays launch of secretive satellite for U.S. Intelligence agency”.
Elon Musk’s SpaceX has pushed back its launch of a mysterious satellite for the U.S. intelligence community because of a sensor issue.
(5) “Our laser beam is better than your laser beam.” “Straight Out of ‘Star Wars’: This ‘Death Star’ Laser Actually Works”.
If it has a beam and if it can destroy an enemy spaceship, it’s a laser. And a laser is a laser is a laser. But it seems there’s always one more laser that operates differently than the others. “Yes, but our laser uses energy transmission.” “Yes, but our laser uses directed energy.” “Yes, but our laser uses X-rays.” “Yes, but our laser is more destructive than your laser.” “Yes, but out laser is portable.” And now, “Yes, but out laser uses convergence.” If your laser can destroy a terrorist bomb without detonating the bomb, then you’ve got something. Me, I’ll settle for a laser in a doctor’s office if it can eliminate the mole on my face so I don’t cut it open when I shave.
(6) Why Living On The Starship Enterprise Would Actually Be Awful.
(7) Scientist celebrities. “‘Genius’ director Ron Howard reveals why he’s on a mission to turn scientists into celebrities”.
Ron Howard’s new television series “Genius” continues the filmmaker’s decades-long love affair with science.
“Look at what Silicon Valley has meant to our economy and our ongoing influence around the world. … What we don’t want to do is cede that position to other countries, other nations, other cultures,” Howard told Business Insider.
Howard was born in 1954, was around for the first moon landings, the rise of personal computing, and the advent of the internet — but he’s also seen the missed opportunities.
“We could have had the [Large] Hadron Collider. But 15 years ago we decided not to fund that. So I’ve always lamented the fact that we didn’t stay in that pole position on that front of exploration,” he said.
(8) Fortune magazine interviews Bill Nye. “‘Science Guy’ Bill Nye’s New Mission”.
How big a danger is fake science and science denial?
Science denial is a big concern right now. Carl Sagan wrote about this 40 years ago—that if you had a society that is increasingly dependent on technology and you have fewer and fewer people who know how it all works, that’s a formula for a disaster. If we have people who refuse to get vaccinated, they become petri dishes for mutating germs. Soon we are going to have 9 or 10 billion people in the world, and those people are going to have to eat, they are going to have to get along, and they all are going to want clean water. And that depends on science—depends on technology that’s derived from science. So if you have people who don’t accept the process by which we create all this wonderful stuff, you’re going to have trouble.
Boy, this Enterprisevideo is bad. Its just the usual tropes (holodeck and transporters are not safe) and the wonder that a lot of stuff happens in a v-series that cause drama. Pretty unimaginative.
(6) The transporter thing always worried me, but it’s not really like a fax. You don’t need to destroy the original (unless you’re Hugh Jackman in The Prestige).
However, since Earth gets attacked with depressing regularity in the various series, I’d rather stay on the Enterprise. At least you get to go very, very fast.
So I learned today that you need different spacesuits for different environments, the ones being used on ISS are too heavy to use on Mars. I feel kinda let down this hasn’t been mentioned in any sci fi book I have read.
@bookworm1398: IIRC Heinlein mentioned a difference between a space-worthy suit and a “pressure suit” suitable for brief excursions on the surface of the Moon, perhaps in The Moon is a Harsh Mistress. I’m not surprised the subject hasn’t come up elsewhere; how many stories do you know that have suits used in at least two substantially different environments?
@OGH re @3: I’ve seen that story elsewhere recently; either NPR or the BBC figured the report came from a good source.