Last weekend’s SPFBO FB group announcement that a reviewer accused of harassing behavior had been dropped attracted comments raising a similar issue about Ed McDonald (not mentioned in the File 770 story). Today several bloggers issued public statements saying they now are convinced the charges against McDonald were fabricated — including two who did much to publicize them.
The Fantasy Book Critic blog today defended McDonald: “Recent Me Too Allegations & Ed McDonald”.
Fantasy Book Critic has now seen irrefutable evidence that the allegations against Ed McDonald have been falsified.
We are now aware that Ed McDonald has been targeted for online harassment and abuse, and there is also irrefutable evidence of this. The evidence proves beyond all doubt that one or two individuals have utilized multiple social accounts with the express purpose of spreading malicious rhetoric against Ed McDonald, and making it appear that ‘reports’ are coming from numerous sources, where in fact they all come from a single source. This source has never met Ed McDonald….
At The Fantasy Inn a blogger known as Book Wol apologized for spreading the allegations, and also claims to have participated in uncovering their falsity: “BookWol: Regarding Ed McDonald Allegations”.
I am writing to publicly retract any allegations that I have been party to against Ed McDonald, and to offer my apologies to him for any distress this has caused him.
Myself and another member of the community were sent allegations against Ed McDonald by a number of social media accounts. These allegations made their way onto the internet and social media.I have been provided with hard evidence that proves beyond doubt that the allegations were falsified.
…With this knowledge, for the purpose of the investigation, I was expressly instructed to behave as normal, continue to show public and if necessary, private support for the individual being investigated. I was to allow public conversations about Ed McDonald to continue and to allow and encourage the individual behind the allegations to feel emboldened by public support for them as evidence was gathered….
…Ed McDonald also provided me with this statement that I may share with you:
“The hurt that was done to me, and the attempt to attack my career and persona has been incredibly hard to bear, but I am glad that the truth has finally come to light. Where people have been deceived and lied to, I ask that they be treated with sympathy, and it be acknowledged that given the extreme nature of the levels of deceit, falsehood and misrepresentation that have been plotted carefully over the period of a year on a scale that nobody could possibly have imagined until the evidence came to light, I bear no ill will to those that were deceived in this way. Please be kind to one another and continue to promote a message of positivity.”
Esme at The Weatherwax Report, who had solicited #MeToo stories from readers, explains in ”About Ed McDonald” why she was deceived:
I was led to believe over a long period of time that Ed McDonald had repeatedly preyed on women he perceived as vulnerable, then discarded them and defamed them afterward. I believed this in its entirety because I was told this over, and over, and over again from seemingly different accounts from totally separate people. They had family histories. They had different profile pics. They had different personas and webpages dedicated to them. They were active accounts that truly appeared to be different entities. I was contacted by a third party investigator several days ago and after listening to what they had to say, I decided to cooperate and hand over evidence I had of these allegations. I no longer believe I was contacted by multiple women, and the feeling it gives me is horror.
The person who’s done this has made a mockery of real victims. One of the HARDEST parts about getting justice for those who have been victimized is just how emotionally straining it is for those who have been hurt to come forward and name someone. When BookWol and myself sent out that tweet asking for your stories, we weren’t inundated with dozens of names with just one or two accusers each. We had two names. With many, many people behind each name. It looked so genuine. One was real. The other was not. This does such terrible, terrible damage to the image of people coming forward. The fact that it was so elaborate and over such a long period of time is nothing short of mind-blowing….
Self-Published Fantasy Blog-Off founder Mark Lawrence, gave the news a signal boost on Reddit, but also cautioned —
It’s also important not to let the fact that this was a hoax make us deaf to others who speak up about such things in the future.
Esme added there that she will be shuttering her blog for awhile in anticipation of being doxxed, and concerns about her personal safety.
I’ve actually just made my public statement that I’ll be closing down for at least a few months, possibly permanently.
From what I understand Ed’s involvement with this person was only 3 weeks of online talk… and they took years out of their lives building this web of lies around him. I can only imagine wtf they will try and do to Wol and myself for exposing it all.
I’ve made the statement on my blog about having the financial means to take them to court if they try anything – and I will also pay for Wols legal fees if she needs any assistance. It would be very unwise if they tried anything but I’ve been told that someone is sniffing around for our real names. We are both preparing for a doxxing event. I’ve been advised it would be wise to lay low for a while, and so I shall. In a few months, maybe after the summer passes, I’ll decide if it’s “safe” for me to pop back up.
[Thanks to Dann for the story.]
#MeToo began in the interest of publicly naming harassers to keep them from further predation. How about naming the false accuser, to keep THEM from further predation?
Uhhh, since the POI operates through convincing false identities, how would knowing their true identity protect thee or me from predation (assuming we were unlucky enough to cross their radar)?
I’m sure their identity will eventually come out, but seeing as there have been some clear criminal violations here, there are probably good procedural reasons for being careful about what is divulged when.
pax / Ctein
This has happened to me once. We saw a newbie account starting a discussion on abuse in one of our forums. Started to talk about how well-known names mailed harassing items in her mailbox. Said other people mailed to warn about them.
Struck up a private conversation with us organizers regarding this. Named names. And then managed to sign with her own nick. The nick of a person that had been banned by at least three organizers for harassment, lying and abuse.
It was kind of scary that time and it has made me more careful with supporting and endorsing causes I do not know anything about. It was also scary to see how much support she got for made up complaints. Thank good the rules stopped her for naming names in open forum (as per Swedens laws against defamation), but I know she has continued campaigning other ways.
Pingback: AMAZING NEWS FROM FANDOM: 3/31/19 - Amazing Stories