Review: Camelot

By Martin Morse Wooster: I’ll guess that Alan Jay Lerner and Frederick Loewe’s 1960 musical Camelot[1] is a musical you’ve heard about but probably haven’t seen.  Yes, there was a movie in 1967 and an HBO version in 1982, but my sense is that this musical is lost in the mists of theatrical history.  Most of us know about how Jacqueline Kennedy, a week after John F. Kennedy’s assassination, declared that the musical was one of JFK’s favorites.  A few of us know a few of the show’s songs.  But I suspect this is a show most people haven’t seen.

Well, I came to the show, currently at the Shakespeare Theatre in Washington, prepared.  Last year, thanks to my book club, I had read the great novel this musical is based on, T.H. White’s The Once and Future King[2].  Weirdly, the normally well-prepared Shakespeare Theatre bookshop, which would happily sell you books by Sir Thomas Malory or Howard Pyle, or a 33-piece “build your own castle” toy set, had no copies of White’s novel for sale.

White’s book is in two parts.  The first part, The Sword in the Stone, is a funny novel about young Arthur, before he became king, and his education by sorcerer Merlyn, who turns him into various animals to teach him what the world is like.  Disney turned this part into a carton in 1963.

The second part, which encompasses several hundred pages, is about Arthur, once he became king, and how he built the Round Table as a way of having knights do something constructive rather than endlessly bash each other.  White then shows the Round Table’s collapse, in part due to the adulterous relationship between the best knight in the realm, Sir Lancelot, and King Arthur’s wife, Guenevere.

In his notes in the program book, Shakespeare Theatre dramaturg Drew Lichtenberg explains that Camelot was the last great “book musical,” where the story mattered as much as the songs.  Lerner, Loewe, and director Moss Hart began work on the show in 1956, after their previous collaboration, My Fair Lady, became a hit.  They eventually had 4 ½ hours of story that they boiled down, in a process that ended up with Loewe retiring, Hart having the first in a series of heart attacks, and Lerner developing “a bleeding ulcer brought on by amphetamine abuse.”

After all this work, how much of The Once and Future King is left?  My sense is that the first half is reasonably close and the second half does a great deal of condensing.

The story begins with Arthur about to be married reminiscing about his days being educated by Merlyn, and how he was once called “Wart.”  But Merlyn teaches Arthur to move forward with his life, and Arthur recalls that when he was an eagle, he noticed there were no physical boundaries between all of the little kingdoms that constituted the England of his time.  He then reveals how he became king by pulling the sword out of the stone and resolves to have all the knights work together in the Round Table, a place where no one is the head.

The call for knights includes people from all over the world, including France, where Lancelot shows up.  Lancelot is the most accomplished knight, but he also falls in love with Arthur’s wife, Guenevere.  Their infidelity, fueled by the appearance of Arthur’s son Mordred, ultimately leads to the collapse of Camelot.

Most of this is in White, but there’s a great deal of simplification as well as the lack of several major characters.  If you’re a fan of Sir Galahad or Sir Bors, you won’t find them in Camelot.  Still, Lerner and Loewe did a good job in boiling down White’s complex novel.

The Internet Movie Database tells me that The Once and Future King has never been filmed.  Surely companies hungry for fantasy miniseries might want to give it a try?  Meanwhile, Variety says that The Sword in the Stone, which has been in development with Disney since 2015, is scheduled to be filmed as a live-action remake in 2019, with Juan Carlos Fresnadillo attached as director.

The Shakespeare Theatre production of Camelot was excellent, with the three leads—Ken Clark as King Arthur, Alexandra Silber as Guenevere, and Nick Fitzer as Lancelot de Lac, having superb voices, although director Alan Paul shouldn’t have made Fitzer use a plummy French accent.  Two long-established character actors in Washington, Ted van Griethuysen as Merlyn and Floyd King as King Pellinore, were also good in their parts.  Merlyn is a small part in Camelot, but King Pellinore is a substantial role, and King was very funny.

I think the last time Camelot played in Washington was in 2003. I hope I will not have to wait another 15 years to see this great fantasy musical again.

[1] Which should not be confused with a “camel lot,” which is where you park your camel.

[2] The proof White’s book is a great book is that it’s not easy to answer the question, “What books are like White’s?  Who did he influence?”

14 thoughts on “Review: Camelot

  1. I’ve seen Camelot several times, from big-budget professional productions to earnest high-school stagings. My single favorite Camelot moment was actually in one of the latter, when Lancelot rode down the center aisle of the auditorium on a horse to the stage singing “C’est Moi” for his big entrance. (Stagehands quickly hustled the horse off and (presumably) outside after he dismounted. To this day I wonder how the theater instructor got permission from the high school principal to do this…)

  2. I have not only seen it, I have been a member of the chorus. Three cheers for community theater! It was 50 years ago, and I remember the music much more than how they boiled down the plot. I like it, some of the songs are very good, but I prefer Brigadoon and Into the Woods for my fantasy musical fixes. Or any of the Gilbert and Sullivan fantasies.

  3. I’ve never seen it on stage (though I would love to). Instead, as a kid I listened to the soundtrack more times than I could ever count, fell in love with Richard Harris, and cried buckets at the ending. I still love it.

  4. @ Sweet: And Robert Goulet and Julie Andrews, wasn’t it? Funny, I thought I remembered Richard Burton doing King Arthur.

  5. A quick google and I see both a Richard Harris and a Richard Burton recording: I remembered an earlier version.

  6. johnstick: @ Sweet: And Robert Goulet and Julie Andrews, wasn’t it? Funny, I thought I remembered Richard Burton doing King Arthur.

    He did. You can see him performing some of the songs on YouTube videos from old b&w TV shows.

    Robert Goulet was Lancelot.

  7. In 2008 a ‘concert version’ of Camelot was presented by the New York Philharmonic, and subsequently broadcast nationwide on PBS.
    King Arthur was Gabriel Byrne, of all people. The rest of the cast were well-known Broadway actors.
    There’s an IMDB page with details, and the mandatory rude review:
    NY Phil Camelot

  8. I’ve seen “Camelot” on stage and as a movie. I’ve seen other settings of the Arthurian legends too, such as the films “Excalibur”, and “Knights of the Round Table”, and “Prince Valiant”, and “A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court” starring Bing Crosby, and one that tried to be historically accurate, being set in the 5th century AD, with the characters wearing Roman armor and the like. And there was a Saturday-morning series in the ’50s about Sir Lancelot–contemporaneous (the TV show, that is) with the better-known “Robin Hood” series starring Richard Green. And of course, don’t forget “Monty Python and the Holy Grail”. But my handy-dandy French-English dictionary renders the French word “camelot” as “cheap woolen cloth”, or “huckster”, and the word “camelote” as “rubbish” (“camelote alimentaire” is “junk food”). Quite a comedown from the heights of chivalry.

  9. Richard Burton, Robert Goulet, and Julie Andrews were the Broadway stage. Richard Harris and Vanessa Redgrave are the movie version.

  10. I’ve seen more stage versions of Camelot than I care to remember. I mean that literally. If only I could forget that one dinner theater one with some kind of a sparkly panel of long fringe instead of a back curtain that made it look like strippers would be coming out instead of Arthur and Guinevere. And the college one that was about four hours long.

    I thought the movie was okay and Franco Nero was certainly pretty as Lancelot.

    Also, Camelot as “the last great book musical”? That seems like a very odd judgment, given everything from Oliver! to Funny Girl. Fiddler on the Roof, Man of La Mancha, Cabaret, 1776, A Little Night Music, Dreamgirls, Phantom, Big River, Les Miz, Into the Woods, Rent, Titanic, Ragtime, Sunset Boulevard, Wicked, Hamilton… Yes, some of them also move the story through their songs, but so does Camelot. And even something like Sweeney Todd, with a lot happening through song, has a book. A great book!

  11. I have a video of the RIchard Harris & Vanessa Redgrave movie version, but it’s so very very ’60s in its costuming that it’s hard not to snicker when watching it. More memorable, oddly so, is that my junior high drama club did an abridged edition of the musical. I don’t remember seeing many live performances at school events, but that one stuck in memory.

Comments are closed.