Roger Ebert (1942-2013)

Roger Ebert seated beside Walt Willis (lower right). Photo via

Roger Ebert seated beside Walt Willis (lower right). Photo via

Movie critic Roger Ebert died April 4, two days after announcing his cancer had returned and he would be stepping back from work as a reviewer. He was 70.

As lights are said to do, he burned brightest at the end, writing more reviews in the last twelve months than any other year of his career.

Ebert openly identified himself as a science fiction fan — especially if he had something negative to say about a science fiction film. Although in that context he was merely placing himself on a par with other aficionados of Lucas and Corman, his trufannish roots extended all the way back to the fanzine fandom of the 1950s.

Ebert was born in Urbana, Illinois in 1942. As a child, he wrote and published a hektographed neighborhood newspaper. After a couple of university students gave him a cardboard carton filled with old Astoundings he became an omnivorous reader of all the sf prozines. He even started doing proto-fanac, writing a letter to the editor of Imagination that ran in the December 1957 issue.

Through Amazing he discovered fanzines, sending 10 or 20 cents to the Coulsons for the latest Yandro. He met fans through the mail, and recalled those heady days in his fannish autobiography, “Thought Experiments: How Propeller-Heads, BNFs, Sercon Geeks, Newbies, Recovering GAFIAtors and Kids in the Basements Invested the World Wide Web, All Except for the Delivery System”

But for the years of their existence, what a brave new world fanzines created! There was a rough democracy at work; no one knew how old you were unless you told them, and locs made it clear that you either had it or you didn’t. First, of course, was the hurdle of getting your stuff accepted. When Lupoff or Coulson or Deckinger printed something by me, that was recognition of a kind that my world otherwise completely lacked.

He produced a fanzine of his own, Stymie, “cutting the ditto masters on an old L.C. Smith and paying an office supply company a few bucks to run it off for me.” How many issues of Stymie were there altogether? The Eaton Collection lists two, both from 1960.

The first fan Ebert met in person was Wilson Tucker He lived in Leland, a hamlet south of Bloomington, not far from Urbana.

Ebert also founded the Urbana High School Science Fiction Club –

We rented “Destination Moon” and showed it in the auditorium, we went to a speech on the campus by Clarke and got his autograph, and we made a tape recording of H.G. Wells’s War of the Worlds, complete with sound effects and a performance by my classmate Dave Stiers, who later became David Ogden Stiers of M*A*S*H.

As a university student, he belonged to ChUSFA, the Champaign-Urbana Science Fiction Association.

But Ebert became progressively more interested in journalism, working as a reporter and starting his own arts tabloid. Fanac took a back seat and he eventually gafiated — although not before a taking a couple of memorable trips to meet out-of-town fans.

In the summer of 1961, now a university student, he flew to Europe on a charter flight and visited Walt and Madeleine Willis at home in Belfast.

They invited me to tea–tomato sandwiches and Earl Grey–and took me around to meet James White, another of Belfast’s BNFs (Big Name Fans), whose prozine collection was carefully wrapped in brown parcel paper, year by year, and labeled (“F&SF 1957″). Fandom was a secret society and I had admission to friends everywhere who spoke the same arcane language.

The next year he visited South Africa. He stopped over in New York and had dinner with several fans, among them the Lupoffs (of Xero fame) and Ted White, who would later buy two stories from him for Fantastic – “After the Last Mass” and “In Dying Venice,” both published in 1972.

Ebert joined the Sun-Times part-time in 1966 while pursuing graduate study at the University of Chicago and got the reviewing job the following year.

His 1975 Pulitzer for distinguished criticism was first, and one of only three, given to a film reviewer since the category was created in 1970.

He often worked mentions of his Pulitzer into his writing, but also reminisced, “Today I can see my name on a full-page ad for a movie with disinterest, but what Harry Warner or Buck Coulson had to say about me–well, that was important.”

He provided the introduction for Richard Lupoff’s The Best of Xero, published in 2004.

As America’s best-known film reviewer, Ebert’s major health problems toward the end of his life were widely covered by the press. However, he denied being an inspiring figure. In a January 2011 e-mail to the Associated Press he wrote, “You play the cards you’re dealt. What’s your choice? I have no pain. I enjoy life, and why should I complain?”

[Thanks to John King Tarpinian for the story.]

Discover more from File 770

Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.

12 thoughts on “Roger Ebert (1942-2013)

  1. Andrew Porter distributed this excerpt from an old fanzine —

    WHO’S WHO IN SCIENCE FICTION FANDOM 1961 Compiled by L. D. Broyles,
    limited to 400 copies:

    EBERT, ROGER, 410 E. Washington, Urbana, Illinois, USA; [born]
    6-18-42; newspaper reporter, also attends Univ. of Illinois, major in
    English. Pub.- STYMIE (defunct). Written – “Fanac of J. Alfred
    Trufan” (KIPPLE), “Ars Gratia Egoboo” fanzine reviews (PARSECTION),
    “Reverberations” column (PSI-PHI), etc., 1955-57. Tape recorder-slow
    and fast. Collects anything — about 1,000 old stf mags, 400 fmz.
    Corresponds only with Les Nirenberg. “Won Illinois Associated Press
    First Place Newswriting Award for ’60 with sports story for The News-
    Gazette in Champaign-Urbana.”

  2. A loss, but given the situation, he lived long and well.
    Thought at times he made a few negative reviews that I disagreed with, but he did these on his own terms. I still miss the dynamics of that show when he did it with Gene Siskal. When they passionately diagreed, it was hard for them to hide this on camera. That itself was good TV. The dynamics were never the same no matter who Ebert used after that.

  3. Norman Hollyn, a fanzine fan of the 1970s who worked in the film industry, says Roger Ebert wrote this about a movie he edited:

    “The most ethical guy on the production must have been Norman Hollyn, the editor, because he didn’t cut anybody out, and there must have been people willing to do him big favors to get out of this movie.”

  4. In his August 25, 2009 blog entry available at Ebert talks about how he gave up alcohol in 1979 and how A.A. helped him deal with booze. It’s a very well-written little memoir.

  5. This is a lovely addition to the pieces written about Roger Ebert on his passing. I remember reading Ebert’s two stories in Fantastic back in the 1970s (I was in high school). But I thought I had read somewhere that there was other fiction written and published by Ebert. Does anybody know?

  6. @Bill: Right, the ISFDB is the source for the stories I listed. It’s also possible he wrote other fiction which has yet to be indexed on ISFDB, or is not sf/fantasy.

  7. Although I was an active movie reviewer myself for about 30 years, I met Ebert only once, in passing. It was at a screening in the New Line Cinema projection room; I don’t remember what the movie was, but Bill Rotsler came with me. Ebert was in the audience, a couple of rows ahead of us. When the movie was over, I hoped to speak to him, but nature wasn’t just calling, it was shrieking. I left Rotsler chatting with Ebert and made a dash to the restroom. When I got back, Ebert was gone; Rotsler said they had had a nice chat. I asked “Did you introduce yourself?” No, he said, why should I do that? Exasperated, I said because he’d know you for your movies AND your fanzine cartoons. Gee, really? said Bill wonderingly. Via eMail I asked Ebert if the name Bill Rotsler meant anything. Sure, he said, he made MANTIS IN LACE. I described his many cartoons; he was surprised the cartoonist and Naked Girl Movie (Rotsler’s term) director were the same person, but he was familiar with both of Bill’s heads.

Comments are closed.