Pixel Scroll 3/14/17 Leather Goddesses Of Phobos And The Scratch And Sniff Card

(1) ROBOWATCH. Of course, I’ll understand if you don’t have any money left for this item after running out to buy yesterday’s featured rocket pen with the tiny astronaut. Which is okay! Because this post is from 2015 and the auction is long over.

MB&F has just announced that they will be donating a unique Melchior (co-created with L’Epée 1839) to the Only Watch auction taking place in November of this year. The Melchior, released at Baselworld earlier this year, is a highly functioning robot-form timepiece that was created in a limited series of 99 pieces. This is the 100th piece.

 

(2) LEARNING CURVE. Ann Leckie has been thinking about rejection.

…Hence my ambivalence–the difficulties are real, and I know every writer has to make their own decision about what to go through, how much rejection to deal with (and whether or not they can handle cluelessly–or maybe intentionally–hurtful comments along with that rejection, including offhand remarks about certain sorts of people not really existing or not being interesting or worthy of stories, when that would include you, yourself). At the same time–if you can do it, if you can stomach it, well, the chances may be really small, but you never know.

And there’s a thing that Mark Tiedemann said to me a while back that I thought was really smart. He said that really, when you submit to an editor over and over (we were mostly talking about shortfic here but still), you’re teaching them how to read your work.

Part of that systemic prejudice, part of what upholds it, is the way people are only familiar with certain kinds of stories. Other kinds feel off, weird, unrealistic (no matter how accurate and realistic they may be). It’s that incessant repetition of the “right” kind of story that keeps reinforcing itself. And this didn’t happen by accident–we’ve many of us been trained from small to appreciate certain kinds of stories, just like we’re taught from infancy to appreciate certain kinds of music. Most of the work, most of the training, is exposure to a high volume of work that fits the culturally approved model.

The way a reader learns to appreciate other sorts of stories, from other points of view, is to be exposed to them over and over. Editors and agents and slush readers–every time you submit, they are being exposed to your work.

(3) IT GOES AROUND. Atlas Obscura’s article about the world’s oldest globe is complete with photos and map recreations. Just about the time it was finished, Columbus was finding something unexpected that would fill the big empty space between Cipangu (Japan) and the Azores.

If the world’s oldest surviving globe has taught us anything, it’s that just when we think we’re starting to figure out how the world works, turns out we barely know anything at all.

Known formally as the Erdapfel (literally “Earth Apple,” or in some colloquial translations “potato”), the oldest globe is an impressive and beautiful artifact, even if its cartographic science is a little off. The Erdapfel dates back to 1492, and is far from the first globe ever created, but it is, so far, the oldest discovered terrestrial globe still in existence.

Round representations of the Earth go back to Ancient Greece, and the earliest spherical maps of the world were being created in the Islamic world in the 13th century or earlier. But none of those are thought to survive. Other than descriptions and flattened maps that would have covered earlier globes, the Erdapfel is the oldest remaining artifact of its kind.

(4) END OF DISCUSSION. At Chaos Manor Jerry Pournelle quotes what he had to say about required FDA drug testing and approval as part of a discussion in a SFWA Forum – which was shut down by a moderator.

That was too much. A SFWA moderator, backed by the officer who had requested that the discussion halt, locked the conference, and it sits in frozen silence. The reason given was that it was too personal, and I was privately informed that there were complaints about me. Since I named no one at any time, I mildly protested that I was unaware of what was personal about it that would be personally offensive to professional writers voluntarily reading a topic no one could possibly feel required to read.

The answer I got was that these discussions upset some members, and that a SFWA forum was no place for political discussions at all. And that’s the point: we have come to this, that a professional writers’ association finds that we can no longer have discussions that include politics because some members (who voluntarily read the topic) find it upsetting, and toxic, presumably because they disagree with the opinions expressed. For the life of me I cannot tell you what professional science fiction writer would find anything I said there personally offensive. Disagree, yes, of course; many disagree; that is to be expected, and it is those the FDA will rally to support the proposition that the FDA should insist that generic prescription of Name Brand drugs whose patents have expired be forbidden until double blind tests of the generic drug’s effectiveness have proved its effectiveness.

I think health care costs can be drastically lowered by letting doctors have more room to try different remedies; obviously only with informed consent of the patient, but medical associations I would suppose will work to assure that; but apparently the entire discussion can’t be discussed in a science fiction professional organization because some members are upset over encountering opinions contrary to their own – and if it can’t be discussed there, where the devil can it be discussed?

(5) WHY YOU CAN’T TELL A BOOK BY ITS COVER. Huffington Post picked up on Nnedi Okorafor’s discussion of a time publishers whitewashed her book cover.

Nebula Award-winning science fiction writer Nnedi Okorafor wrote a book in 2007 called The Shadow Speaker. The story followed its protagonist ? a Muslim girl named Ejii, who the author described as “black skinned” ? through Niger in 2070.

So Okorafor was understandably unhappy when her publisher suggested putting a white woman on the book’s cover.

Today, the author shared the anecdote as part of a Twitter conversation about whitewashing in fiction. She tweeted the cover suggested by the publisher and the revised cover, updated to feature the story’s black protagonist, per the author’s request.

(6) HUGOS RECS. Abigail Nussbaum explains her 2017 Hugo ballot nominees in the media categories.

Best Related Work: This is the category that I always feel most guilty about not nominating more widely in.  There’s a lot of great non-fiction being written in genre right now, on- and off-line, but since my threshold for substantiveness excludes most individual blog posts, I often end up with very little that I want to nominate here.  The solution, obviously, is to read more long-form non-fiction–UIP’s Modern Masters of Science Fiction is a great source that I somehow never get around to–but happily this year has been a good one for long-form online essays and blog series. (Not listed in this ballot, because he’s asked people not to nominate it, but still very much worth reading and remembering, is Jonathan McCalmont’s “Nothing Beside Remains: A History of the New Weird”, which delves into the short half-life of this genre, and the critical conversation that surrounded it.)

  • A People’s History of the Marvel Universe by Steven Attewell – The only criticism I can make of Attewell’s series is that it seems to be on permanent hiatus, just when we could use an independent history of this corner of pop culture, told from a decidedly leftist perspective.  Attewell delves into the origins of several key Marvel characters and concepts, from Magneto’s background as a Holocaust survivor, to the infamous “mutant metaphor”.  He describes both the evolution of ideas we’ve come to take for granted, and the pitfalls the Marvel writers fell into as they tried to grapple with social upheaval and the need to reflect it in their world of heroes and villains.  With superheroes currently one of the dominant forms in our pop culture, a perspective like Attewell’s is invaluable.
  • Boucher, Backbone, and Blake – the Legacy of Blakes 7 by Erin Horakova – One of the many remarkable things about Erin’s essay is how accessible and thought-provoking it is even to someone like myself, who has been hearing about Blakes 7 for years, but has seen almost nothing of it.  This is by no means an introductory piece or a guide to newbies.  Its focus is specific, one might almost say deliberately fannish.  And yet, by turning her eye on some very particular aspects of the show, and the people who were instrumental in achieving them, Erin builds a larger argument about the intersection between art and politics, about the capacity of popular entertainment to grapple with difficult, even radical ideas, and about the specific circumstances on the set of Blakes 7 that allowed it to do so, and how modern work would struggle to achieve the same effect.  It’s a brilliant piece of cultural commentary (as already acknowledged by the voters for the BSFA award’s non-fiction category) and one that absolutely belongs on this year’s Hugo ballot.

(7) A LINE IN THE CHROME. Scalzi does not object to award eligibility posts – he makes them – but he doesn’t want to be directly asked for a Hugo nominating vote. Does that mean an ethical lesson is being imparted here, or is this a lesson in netiquette?

(8) PRATCHETT BUSTED. The BBC has the story.

A bronze bust of Sir Terry Pratchett has been unveiled ahead of plans to install a 7ft (2.1m) statue of the author in Salisbury, Wiltshire.

It was created by Paul Kidby, who illustrated Sir Terry’s Discworld novels, before his death in 2015.

The statue of the author, who lived locally, is due to be erected in the marketplace or Elizabeth Gardens.

Mr Kidby said getting his expression right so “he’s not unhappy” but “not smiling too much” was the hardest part.

(9) THE GREEN FLASH. Skyboat Media’s Kickstarter has funded – so there will be an 11 hour digital audiobook of Lightspeed Magazine’s Queers Destroy Science Fiction.

(10) TODAY’S DAY

  • March 14 – 3.14 – is Pi Day.

(11) TODAY IN HISTORY

  • March 14, 1968 Batman, starring Adam West and Burt Ward, aired its last episode.

(12) TODAY’S BIRTHDAY GIRL

  • Born March 14, 1887 — Sylvia Beach, founder of the Parisian bookstore Shakespeare and Co. “Ray Bradbury visited this bookshop every time he was in Paris, usually in July,” remembers John King Tarpinian. “They would save signed first edition Jules Vern books for Ray.”

(13) TODAY’S BIRTHDAY GENIUS

  • Born March 14, 1879 – Albert Einstein

(14) COMIC SECTION. John King Tarpinian was amused by another Star Wars reference in Brevity.

(15) STARDUST IN OUR POCKETS LIKE GRAINS OF SAND. AKA, The Mote In Your Eye. Because the New York Times says there are “Flecks of Extraterrestrial Dust, All Over The Roof”.

After decades of failures and misunderstandings, scientists have solved a cosmic riddle — what happens to the tons of dust particles that hit the Earth every day but seldom if ever get discovered in the places that humans know best, like buildings and parking lots, sidewalks and park benches. The answer? Nothing. Look harder. The tiny flecks are everywhere. An international team found that rooftops and other cityscapes readily collect the extraterrestrial dust…

(16) APPLY TO BE A HARPER VOYAGER.  The Harper Voyager line is putting out a call for any SFF-obsessed bloggers and social media “bigmouths” to apply to join their team of super-readers.

Harper Voyagers are granted special access to early review copies, private author chats, and more. The application period runs from now through May 4 – use the application form at Google Docs.

ARE YOU A HARPER VOYAGER?

Are you a fan of Science Fiction, Urban Fantasy, Fantasy or Horror? Would you like special access to e-galleys, author interactions, and swag? If so, the Harper Voyager US team invites you to apply to become a “Harper Voyager” super reader!

As a Harper Voyager super reader, you’ll get special access to early review copies, special entry to an exclusive online forum where they can post reviews and thoughts about the exclusive book previews, engage in private author chats, and special interactions with Harper Voyager authors at regional events.  Most of all, we hope our super readers will help generate excitement for our stellar authors!

Please Note: This program is asking super readers to post honest reviews on Goodreads and consumer sites, participation in online Voyager events; virtual support of Voyager authors across social media. If you chose to post these reviews online at consumer websites, you must disclose in the review that you received your copy for free and send us a link to the review.

(17) LISTEN IN. DMS says Ian Tregillis tells a pretty good story beginning at 8:25 of this interview.

Ian Tregillis is the son of a bearded mountebank and a discredited tarot card reader. He was born and raised in the Minnesota Territory, where his parents had settled after fleeing the wrath of a Flemish prince. (The full story, he’s told, involves a Dutch tramp steamer and a stolen horse.) He holds a Ph.D. in physics for his research on radio galaxies and quasars, and is an alumnus of the Clarion workshop.

 

[Thanks to John King Tarpinian, Jerry Pournelle, DMS, Daniel Dern, JJ, and Cat Eldridge for some of these stories. Title credit goes to File 770 contributing editor of the day Jack Lint.]

113 thoughts on “Pixel Scroll 3/14/17 Leather Goddesses Of Phobos And The Scratch And Sniff Card

  1. He, living in the country side in the northern Sweden without a car? You can just forget about it. There is more or less no public transportation, the distances with a car might be half an hour (or even more) to the closest store for the basics.

    Try walking 30 miles in temperatures below 0F and then back. I would not recommend you to try a bike in that snow.

  2. @Bryan

    This is very good for you. However, as others have pointed out, you’re still making the same mistake: you’re thinking that just because you did it, everyone can.

    Sorry, that isn’t so.

    For instance, I live in Prescott (AZ). I happen to live in town, only 3.8 miles from my job; but if I lived in Prescott Valley (10 miles from my job, with the only way there a hellaciously busy Highway 69) I could no more walk to work than I could fly. Not to mention that said Highway 69 has no walking paths and I would be taking my life in my hands to attempt such a thing.

    And how about (speaking again of northern Arizona) all those people who live in Dewey, Humboldt, Spring Valley and Cordes Junction, where there are no grocery stores (aside from a Circle K or similar) within a 30-mile distance? You think they could walk to the store?

    Frankly, you are coming across as a very privileged, condescending person. Just because you didn’t fall over from heatstroke walking in Tucson (if that’s where you lived) in the summer heat doesn’t mean it didn’t happen to plenty of other people. Not everyone can pull themselves up by their bootstraps (if said bootstraps even exist) just because you say so.

  3. For most of my stay in Southern California, I did not have a car. This turned out to be a really, really bad idea. I survived with buses, public transportation and walking, but doing so was a miserable experience.

    Worse was the time I was stupid and tried to walk to work here in Minnesota the day my previous car’s battery died. It was -9F.

    All this reminds me of a recent story where a hardworking person was found to be walking >2 hours a day to and from work. Is a car absolutely necessary for him? No. Is his quality of life being severely limited by the lack of that car? You bet.

  4. Bryan on March 20, 2017 at 7:30 pm said:

    Try carrying more than one 10-pound bag of groceries, at temperatures over 85F.
    Try walking at least one mile at a temperature above 110F.

    I live in southern Arizona. You walk anywhere during the summer its at temperatures above 110F. So yes, I have walked more than a mile in that temperature, and yes I’ve carried more than 10 pounds of groceries in that heat.

    110F is 43 degrees C? OK, then walking a distance carrying stuff was a bad idea.

  5. Frankly, you are coming across as a very privileged, condescending person.

    Not everyone can pull themselves up by their bootstraps (if said bootstraps even exist) just because you say so.

    So I’m condescending because when people say a thing can’t be done, I counter with examples of having done them? Suuure. (that was condescending). If I had instead pointed at the hundreds of thousands of other people who do it, would that also be condescending? (still being condescending)

    For the second part of the quote, I have no idea what you’re even arguing against. I never mentioned anybody “pulling themselves up by their bootstraps.” And it has nothing at all to do with this conversation. For some not driving is a choice and others it is because they don’t have the choice (or a car).

    I will readily admit that I am privileged. I own a car and if I don’t want to walk I don’t have to. But that does not negate my original point. People can and do live their life without personally driving a car and buying auto insurance.

  6. Bryan: So I’m condescending because when people say a thing can’t be done, I counter with examples of having done them?

    No one said it couldn’t be done. You are trying to reverse this discussion from what it really was — you know, the one we can all scroll back up and read, not the retconned version you are now claiming it was.

    You are the one who said that “driving is merely a convenience”.

    Other people then pointed out that no, for a great many people, driving is a necessity and not merely a convenience.

    And then you kept insisting that since you had been able to do without driving, anyone should be able to do it.

    And yes, that’s a really clueless and condescending thing for you to say.

  7. So I’m condescending because when people say a thing can’t be done, I counter with examples of having done them?

    Except you have not done so, and the fact that you don’t realize this is part of the condescension.

  8. Bryan,
    If you had led with:

    For some not driving is a choice and others it is because they don’t have the choice (or a car).

    Instead of:

    The second difference if you don’t want to buy auto insurance, you can simply choose to not drive. Choosing to not live is generally a frowned upon solution to not wanting to buy health insurance. Driving is a choice and a revocable privilege.

    Then I don’t think you’d have got any pushback. You said both, but your more recent comment acknowledges that not everyone has the choice to drive a car, unlike your first comment. That’s what other commenters have been trying to point out to you.

  9. The second difference if you don’t want to buy auto insurance, you can simply choose to not drive.

    Based on the places I have lived in the Southern U.S., the idea a car is something people can choose to do without is blind to the reality that most people face. People live where they can afford and work where they can find a job. These two are often far apart and mass transit woefully inadequate.

    When you “choose” not to have a car in a place like Dallas or Jacksonville, your employment options dwindle considerably.

    My second job in high school was at a Toys ‘R Us in North Dallas. A lot of the workers were coming all the way from South Dallas and had to ride the then-new and extremely limited DART bus routes. I’ll never forget one female co-worker in her 30s telling me that the trip took six hours of each day.

    In most of the U.S. people who can afford a car get a car, because their life without one would be a major hardship. And if they lose that car they can fall a couple rungs down the ladder. People don’t choose that. Circumstance does.

  10. I’ll never forget one female co-worker in her 30s telling me that the trip took six hours of each day.

    I remember being in community college, and having my classes move across the city to a new campus. To get there with only one bus transfer required walking a mile to that bus line, riding several miles across town, transferring – and hoping that second bus would arrive at all (because it didn’t always), so doing all of this with considerable additional time.
    And then doing it again in a different area, with a four-year college, and more than 20 miles of travel each way, and not being able to take classes that ended after 4 pm, because bus service.
    (And one brief job that was 5:30 pm to 4 am – so I walked the couple of miles home, through a deserted industrial park.)

  11. The “twitchiness” comes with being required to purchase the insurance. I believe that having health insurance is important to me and therefore I have it. But I also feel that if I wanted to risk bankruptcy by not having health insurance that should also be my choice.

    I know this was said awhile ago, but I didn’t see this point made and it’s driving me nuts –

    Bryan, you may have the steadfastness and fortitude to nobly vow that you’ll drop dead in the street rather than appeal to the public coffer for medical help with treatable disease, but the fact remains that this country people dying in the street are not (yet) the province of the Sanitation department alone. People dying in the street are entitled to – and get – emergency treatment of life-threatening illness. And that includes illness that BECOMES life-threatening because people pass up medical treatment that could prevent illness from becoming that serious because they can’t afford it. And illness that are neglected till they HAVE advanced to such an emergency state are notoriously more expensive to treat than if they were caught early. The hospital treats those people and eats the cost if the people have no money to pay for it. Which leads to higher costs for other patients, and taxpayers, or the closing of needed hospitals in tighter-fisted areas.

    You may nobly refuse to call 911 if (god forbid) you feel the incipient pain of a myocardial infarction and know you can’t afford the costs involved. But strictly from my personal experience, I’ve never seen anyone who comes to the ER with an acutely life-threatening condition try to walk out due to worry over cost. They just don’t want to die and they want help. I think they deserve it and they should get it – even the ones who blithely say when they’re in perfect health that they’re happy to take responsibility for their own care and resent being made to pay for it.

    I think they should get the help…but I do resent that all those rugged individualists drive up the costs for everyone else by propagating the myth that health care is an avoidable expense, and thus making our healthcare system the most expensive for the worst outcome. We ALL pay when the next bankrupt uninsured rugged individualist stumbles in to the ER with uncontrolled diabetes requiring an amputation.

  12. @Bryan

    Doubling down does not help your cause.

    You never answered my question. You live in AZ. Have you ever been to Prescott? Do you honestly expect people in Dewey, Humboldt, Mayer, Spring Valley, Congress, Kirkland, Paulden, Seligman, Peeples Valley, Yarnell, and Cordes Junction to get along without a car?

    (For the uninitiated, these are ALL small towns in Northern Arizona without grocery stores and most other amenities.)

    Do you acknowledge there is no real public transportation in Prescott and Prescott Valley?

    If there is not, why do you keep spouting this nonsense?

    Again, just because you did it does not mean everyone can. For you to pretend otherwise is insulting.

  13. @jayn

    All the +1’s!!!

    @Bryan

    This is essentially a free rider problem. The ER’s are legally and morally required to provide service. Through the mechanism of bankruptcy you are not obligated to pay for those services. Your desire not to pay for healthcare drives up expense for everyone else. The classic solution to a free rider problem is government intervention such as taxation. What other solution do you have to solve the issue?

    Prior to the ACA I’ve seen employer health insurance for mid size companies rising at 30 to 40% a year. Our Benefits team was proud of a major victory the year they kept it at 27%. Since the ACA we’ve seen it stabilize at about 15%. Is the law flawed? Yes. But it’s a major improvement on what went before. We should be tweaking it (for instance allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices, tightening medical loss ratios, etc) instead of sabotaging it then demanding repeal. Well that or moving on to single payer but that’s likely a step too far today.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *