The
The Times article points out how many important moments in scientific history Wheeler was present at: for example, he accompanied Niels Bohr to Albert Einstein’s office at
[Registration required to read the Times online.]
The
The Times article points out how many important moments in scientific history Wheeler was present at: for example, he accompanied Niels Bohr to Albert Einstein’s office at
[Registration required to read the Times online.]
Apex Digest has announced the lineup for its 13th issue — and shouldn’t that be something special for a horror (and science fiction) magazine?
“Scenting the Dark” (4000 words) – Mary Robinette Kowal
“Blankenjel” (6100 words) – Lavie Tidhar
“In the Seams” (7200 words) – Andrew Porter
“Nature of Blood” (7500 words) – George Mann
“I Know an Old Lady” (500 words) – Nathan Rosen
But our Andrew Porter (Hugo winner for Science Fiction Chronicle, 1990 Worldcon fan GoH, etc.) wants to make sure credit for “In the Seams” goes to the proper party: “It’s not by me,” he writes.
SF Awards Watch is having a lively discussion about self-promotion for awards that now includes a tangential debate about whether non-U.S. authors are more likely to be nominated for Hugos at Worldcons outside the U.S.
C. E. Petit took the affirmative side of the question. Kevin Standlee disagrees:
“If there really was such a ‘locals for locals’ effect, why did we not see a flood of Japanese works on the 2007 Hugo Awards ballot? …In addition, 2005 should have seen a disproportionate number of Canadian and 2006 a similar share of British nominees…”
That’s a misrepresentation of the Japanese example. The 2007 final report shows a nearly complete absence of votes for any Japanese work or person. When you look at Hugo voting reports for Worldcons in Australia, Canada and the UK, there is a very different pattern, lots of votes for locals (even if most don’t make the final ballot.) Kevin’s use of the Japanese example only works if he proves that they participated and voted for English language works, which surely is not what happened. (I hope eventually a Japanese fan will articulate for us why there wasn’t local participation.)
However, I feel this whole discussion goes amiss because there is an implicit assumption that if there actually is a “locals for locals” effect that must be assumed to be an e-vile thing.
The Hugos are democratically selected by the members, and when the Worldcon goes overseas a lot of people get involved who don’t join when it’s in the
I look at the 2005 Hugo ballot and see that the members of the Glasgow Worldcon have filled the Best Novel category with works by
Long before the 2005 nominations came out, I was hearing American fans on convention panels heavily touting Susanna Clarke’s novel, which of course won. The authors of two other novel finalists had been nominated for a Hugo before (by a non-U.K. Worldcon), and a third, McDonald, has been nominated and won since (Nippon 2007). Banks was the only writer whose 2005 Hugo nomination is an isolated event.
As for 2003, that’s when members of the Toronto Worldcon voted the Best Novel Hugo to favorite son Robert Sawyer. Yet that was the sixth time a novel by Sawyer was nominated. It’s hard to say the people who voted for him are some kind of outlying opinion group doing something no other Worldcon would consider.
So I tend to think there is a local effect, but not one with insidious results.
(If I wanted to take Kevin’s side of the argument, I would start with the 2006 fan Hugo results. I’m still waiting for the local effect to kick in!)
I’ve been working on a new blog entry that explores why a particular controversy seems to have died away. It will be a much better discussion if I have input from people with real experience about the subject. I e-mailed a letter to a short list of people asking for their help.
While I was doing this two thoughts crossed my mind. First, some of these people blog. They might think, “Why should I waste these golden words on File 770?” They might just post their answer online and send me the link.
Second, if I ask them about a moribund controversy, and they blog about it, won’t that revive the controversy and kill the premise for my article?
Well, my first thought came to pass. Now I am waiting on the second.
It is a proud and lonely thing to be a nexus of alternate history.
Hear the name of Ray Bradbury and you’re soon thinking about science fiction, libraries, fire… Or so reason the people who added Fahrenheit 451 to the archives of revived Library of Alexandria (Bibliotheca Alexandrina) on March 10 as part of a commemoration of Julius Caesar burning antiquity’s most famous library in 38 A.D.
(Most readers probably recall there’s a bit more to that story. Julius actually ordered some ships in the harbor set afire, but the resulting conflagration carried ashore, burning several structures including the Library.)
The Library of Alexandria finally vanished in the mists of history over a thousand years ago (and who’s to blame for that is a topic of scholarly debate). The Bibliotheca Alexandrina was inaugurated in 2003 near the site of the original Library, to commemorate the old center of learning and carry on some of its work. Now Bradbury’s most famous book is part of its growing collection.
Taking advantage of the interest in the book spawned by this story, Bradbury made a fresh plea for a more accurate understanding of why he wrote it. In an New York Times interview on March 19 he denied that book was a response to McCarthyism. “I wasn’t thinking about McCarthy so much as I was thinking of the library of
John King Tarpinian sent me this story and took the accompanying photo. He helped the City of South Pasadena (CA) celebrate “Ray Bradbury Day” on March 10. A write-up by the City Librarian appears here. (The article contains a little blooper, stating that the Library of Alexandria “was built for Julius Caesar in 38 A.D.” Uh, no.)
(Denvention 3 Press Release) Lee Kuruganti has won Denvention 3’s competition to design the 2008 Hugo Award statue base.
Lee Kuruganti is a professional, digital artist based in Colorado. Her fantastic art has been published by Baen, Static Movement Online, Withersin, Spacesuits and Sixguns, the Lorelei Signal and Sorcerous Signals. She created the poster for the recent film Extinction. Kuruganti reports that “One of my favorite moments was being selected as an artist for an international mural project for Olympic Games Seoul.”
Kuruganti was a semi-finalist in the L. Ron Hubbard Illustrators of the Future Contest. She’s also done several solo shows, and has exhibited in many galleries.
Click to read the rest of Denvention 3’s press release
The 2008
The Phoenix Award went posthumously to Jim Baen, founder and publisher of Baen Books.
The Rebel Award was presented to Kelly Lockhart, editor of the Southern Fandom Resource Guide website.
The Rubble Award, a faux award created by Gary Robe, was given to Bob Embler, chairman of Outside Con and the 2007 DeepSouthCon, for picking the one rainy weekend in a
A new website celebrates the memory of legendary Southern fan Hank Reinhardt. It includes tributes from his friends and a selection of Hank’s fanwriting. Fans who would like to add material should contact Julie Wall. [Source: Southern Fandom Confederation Bulletin, March 2008]
The “Library Bookies,” with NESFA’s Gay Ellen Dennett (center) and non-fans Rose Doherty and Lindsey Kiser, survived a 30-minute duel with the Needham Democratic Town Committee team to win the Needham Education Foundation’s 18th Annual Spelling Bee. They triumphed by correctly spelling “formicivorous,” an adjective that means “ant-eating.”
It was the first win ever for the “Library Bookies,” a team that has competed in every Spelling Bee since the beginning (a team by that name, not the same team members). Each year the NEF’s “Library Bookies” team is composed of a trustee, a staff member, and a member of the supporting Friends group. Adding Lindsey Kiser (right) this year may have helped, because her teams have won the Spelling Bee at least seven times.